As the primary author of 4301, and the creator of the PAD, I believe
this work
does update that section of 4301. I agree with Kathleen that this doc
needs to
say precisely what parts of 4301 are being updated, perhaps using a
before/after
approach.
Steve
On Apr 1, 2015, at 6:57 PM, Kathleen Moriarty
<[email protected]> wrote:
I went back to the email thread as I wanted to look at the consensus and don't
see it the way Paul does.
Here is the end of the thread:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/current/msg09668.html
It reads as confusion with the term updates and most being ok with going in
either direction, Paul against and Yaron more in favor.
Yes, exactly. So, it sounds like you see the consensus (and confusion) the way
I do.
Updates can update very specific text in a draft. Since this just applies in
this special case, the updates text needs to be clearly worded to reflect that
or you copy in all the text that applies from the other draft.
Sounds fine. Who do you want to make that decision?
--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
