S/mostly// 

Add IKE over tcp and DNS extensions for ikev2?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 1, 2016, at 11:18, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote:
> 
> Greetings. We need to update our charter to reflect our current and expected 
> work. Dave and I propose the following text. Please let us know within the 
> next week if you have suggestions for changes.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman and Dave Waltermire
> 
> 
> The IPsec suite of protocols includes IKEv1 (RFC 2409 and associated RFCs),
> IKEv2 (RFC 7296), and the IPsec security architecture (RFC 4301). IPsec is
> widely deployed in VPN gateways, VPN remote access clients, and as a
> substrate for host-to-host, host-to-network, and network-to-network
> security.
> 
> The IPsec Maintenance and Extensions Working Group continues the work of
> the earlier IPsec Working Group which was concluded in 2005. Its purpose is
> to maintain the IPsec standard and to facilitate discussion of clarifications,
> improvements, and extensions to IPsec, mostly to IKEv2.
> The working group also serves as a focus point for other IETF Working Groups
> who use IPsec in their own protocols.
> 
> The current work items include:
> 
> IKEv2 contains the cookie mechanism to protect against denial of service
> attacks. However this mechanism cannot protect an IKE end-point (typically,
> a large gateway) from "distributed denial of service", a coordinated attack by
> a large number of "bots". The working group will analyze the problem and
> propose a solution, by offering best practices and potentially by extending
> the protocol.
> 
> IKEv2 utilizes a number of cryptographic algorithms in order to provide
> security services. To support interoperability a number of mandatory-to-
> implement (MTI) algorithms are defined in RFC4307. There is interest in
> updating the MTIs in
> RFC4307 based on new algorithms, changes to the understood security
> strength of existing algorithms, and the degree of adoption of previously
> introduced algorithms. The group will revise RFC4307 proposing updates to
> the MIT algorithms used by IKEv2 to address these changes.
> 
> There is interest in supporting Curve25519 and Curve448 for ephemeral key
> exchange in the IKEv2 protocol. The group will extend the
> IKEv2 protocol to support key agreement using these curves and their
> related functions.
> 
> This charter will expire in August 2016. If the charter is not updated before
> that time, the WG will be closed and any remaining documents revert back to
> individual Internet-Drafts.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to