On Wed, 11 May 2016, [email protected] wrote:
A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-08
Thanks Tero, My only question is regarding the table formerly known as table 9. If we concluded that RFC7427 is not widely implemented yet, is there any reason to keep 5 SHOULD NOT entries there instead of making those MUST NOT ? Paul _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
