Hello, On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > two comments: > >> Am 02.09.2016 um 15:41 schrieb Tero Kivinen <[email protected]>: >> >> Also I would assume that during 2017 we most likely will get some new >> work items that will start working on, thus we will most likely want >> to do recharter by the end of 2017 anyways. > > If that’s the case I would recommend to remove the deadline from the charter. > Please note that if you end up without new work you can always ask your AD to > close the group (even without this deadline in the charter).
I don't see why this is such an issue, including a deadline in the charter. It hasn't been a problem for the past 2.5 year (and for the AD for this group before). I'm fine with a deadline remaining in the charter. > >> And if there is nothing >> new to be done, and we have only 1-2 items left, we can continue >> working them without WG if needed. > > That’s usually not a good ideas. If you don’t have a wg all docs need to be > AD sponsored. If you have a wg you can just finish your doc, ask for reviews > on the mailing, and run an WGLC to ensure there is enough review. You don’t > have to have meetings or what ever. I don’t see a reason to close a wg before > the work is done (if there is enough energy to finish the work). I can manage this with the WG. Thank you. > > Mirja > -- Best regards, Kathleen _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
