On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <[email protected]> wrote: > That’s fine. It’s just my opinion. But as responsible AD you can of course > handle this as you like.
Sure and thanks for that. The chairs did their analysis on the timeline and shared that with me. I think their analysis and justification is reasonable and I trust their judgement and don't want to micromanage the group as it's running just fine. Thanks, Kathleen > > Mirja > > >> Am 02.09.2016 um 18:36 schrieb Kathleen Moriarty >> <[email protected]>: >> >> Hello, >> >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> two comments: >>> >>>> Am 02.09.2016 um 15:41 schrieb Tero Kivinen <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Also I would assume that during 2017 we most likely will get some new >>>> work items that will start working on, thus we will most likely want >>>> to do recharter by the end of 2017 anyways. >>> >>> If that’s the case I would recommend to remove the deadline from the >>> charter. Please note that if you end up without new work you can always ask >>> your AD to close the group (even without this deadline in the charter). >> >> I don't see why this is such an issue, including a deadline in the >> charter. It hasn't been a problem for the past 2.5 year (and for the >> AD for this group before). >> >> I'm fine with a deadline remaining in the charter. >> >>> >>>> And if there is nothing >>>> new to be done, and we have only 1-2 items left, we can continue >>>> working them without WG if needed. >>> >>> That’s usually not a good ideas. If you don’t have a wg all docs need to be >>> AD sponsored. If you have a wg you can just finish your doc, ask for >>> reviews on the mailing, and run an WGLC to ensure there is enough review. >>> You don’t have to have meetings or what ever. I don’t see a reason to close >>> a wg before the work is done (if there is enough energy to finish the work). >> >> I can manage this with the WG. >> >> Thank you. >> >>> >>> Mirja >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best regards, >> Kathleen > -- Best regards, Kathleen _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
