Tero, please do add them and I'll approve. We can do these separately, but having them up-to-date is helpful and it is also helpful to have them with a charter so the scope of work is clear. SOrry I didn't catch that.
Thank you, Kathleen On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Tero, that is helpful. > > Ben. > > On 15 Sep 2016, at 7:36, Tero Kivinen wrote: > >> Ben Campbell writes: >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> COMMENT: >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> The milestones are all in the past. Should 2016 be 2017? Also, I notice >>> the milestone list does not cover the full set of current goals--is that >>> the intent? (I'm okay if it is; just checking.) >> >> I was assume that we need get the charter approved before we can add >> milestones for new items. >> >> I would expect the milestones to be something like this: >> >> Oct 2016 IETF Last Call on DDoS protection >> draft-ietf-ipsecme-ddos-protection >> Oct 2016 IETF Last Call on Curve25519 and Curve448 for IKEv2 >> draft-ietf-ipsecme-safecurves >> Nov 2016 IETF Last Call on cryptographic algorithms for IKEv2 >> draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis >> Nov 2016 IETF Last Call on cryptographic algorithms for ESP / AH >> draft-mglt-ipsecme-rfc7321bis >> Dec 2016 IETF Last Call on TCP Encapsulation of IKE and IPsec >> draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps >> Jan 2017 IETF Last Call on Using EdDSA in the IKEv2 >> draft-nir-ipsecme-eddsa >> Feb 2017 IETF Last Call on Split-DNS Configuration for IKEv2 >> draft-pauly-ipsecme-split-dns >> Feb 2017 IETF Last Call on Implicit IV in IPsec >> draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv >> Jun 2017 IETF Last Call on partially quantum resistant IKEv2 >> >> DDos and safecurves are already ready for IETF Last Call. >> >> rfc4307bis and rfc7321bis are in WG LC phase now, and should be ready >> soon. >> >> Tcp encaps, split dns and implict iv are waiting for more cycles in >> the WG, i.e. we want to push the current things out first and then >> concentrate on them. EdDSA is waiting for curdle to decide on the >> OIDs, and QR actually needs some work. >> -- >> [email protected] > -- Best regards, Kathleen _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
