> On 16 Feb 2018, at 20:06, Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote: > > This charter text was not ready during the IETF 100, we just had very > short description about the item, and I think most of the people did > not really understand it. > > The proposed charter text for this item is: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Some systems support security labels (aka security context) as one of > the selectors of the SPD. This label needs to be part of the IKE > negotiation for the IPsec SA. non-standard implementations exist for > IKEv1 (formerly abusing IPSEC Security Association Attribute 10, now > using private space IPSEC Security Association Attribute 32001). The > work is to standarize this for IKEv2. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Is that charter text clear enough?
Yeah, I think anyone who’s heard of multilevel security understands what is proposed here. > Is there enough people interested > in this? I guess, since MLS keeps coming up… I’m not, but I’m not opposed to doing this as long as there’s no burden on non-supporting implementations. > > Send your comments and whether you support adding this to the charter > to the ipsec list in next two weeks. > -- > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
