Hi David,

Thanks! I’ll work on this today and send an update.

Tommy

> On Feb 26, 2018, at 4:51 PM, Waltermire, David A. (Fed) 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Authors,
> 
> Overall the draft is almost ready to submit to the IESG once the following 
> few small issues are resolved. 
> 
> Section 1.1:
> 
> There are a few lowercase instances of must, may, and should in the document. 
> You should use text from RFC8174 to indicate that lowercase versions of the 
> keywords are not normative.
> 
> Something like the following would work:
> 
>   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
>   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
>   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
>   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
>   capitals, as shown here.
> 
> Please double check the lowercase "must", "should", and "may" instances to be 
> sure they are properly non-capitalized.
> 
> In section 3.1 the document states:
> 
> If an INTERNAL_DNSSEC_TA attriute is included
>   in the CFG_REQUEST, the initiator SHOULD also include one or more
>   INTERNAL_DNS_DOMAIN attributes in the CFG_REQUEST.
> 
> The behavior for the responder is not defined in section 3.2 if this "SHOULD" 
> is violated. Would it be desireable for the responder to ignore the 
> INTERNAL_DNSSEC_TA attribute? This behavior should be defined either way.
> 
> (nit) s/attriute/attribute/ (I think Tero already found this and we are 
> waiting to handle this in AD review/IETF LC.)
> 
> Section 3.4.2:
> 
> (nit) s/attributes/attributes/
> 
> (nit) s/received in the CFG_REPLY/received in the CFG_REPLY./
> 
> "In this example, the initiator has no existing DNSSEC trust anchors would 
> the requested domain." Should this be 'for the requested domain 
> "example.com."'? The following sentence should start with a capitalized 
> letter. The paragraph should end with a period.
> 
> How about the following as a replacement:
> 
> In this example, the initiator has no existing DNSSEC trust anchors
>   for the requested domain "example.com". The responder provides DNSSEC
>   trust anchors for the "example.com" domain, but does not configure trust 
> anchors for the "city.other.com" domain.
> 
> Section 5:
> 
> The first sentence of the 6th paragraph contains a lowercase "must", which I 
> believe should be capitalized.
> 
> (nit) s/be be/be/
> 
> Once this is all fixed I will send the draft to the IESG. I'll complete the 
> writeup using your text as a starting point in the interim.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to