I have no IPR whatsoever on this document and don’t know of anyone who does

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 1, 2018, at 13:15, Waltermire, David A. (Fed) 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Tommy and Paul,
> 
> I have the shepherd write-up ready.
> 
> Please confirm as authors that "any and all appropriate IPR disclosures 
> required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have 
> already been filed."
> 
> I will send it forward once I hear from each of you.
> 
> Thanks,
> Dave
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Paul Wouters [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 1:38 PM
>> To: Tommy Pauly <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Waltermire, David A. (Fed) <[email protected]>; IPsecME WG
>> <[email protected]>; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [IPsec] Shepherd Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-06
>> 
>>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Tommy Pauly wrote:
>>> 
>>> I’ve updated the draft with your comments as version -
>> 07: https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww
>> .ietf.org%2Fid%2Fdraft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-
>> 07.txt&data=02%7C01%7Cdavid.waltermire%40nist.gov%7C7f9c42b6862143c
>> e554d08d57eda625f%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7
>> C636554398785720298&sdata=IgghLE%2BFeO5%2B1Sti0QqzJKEogVgQ%2Ftle
>> icvZExvDZ6Q%3D&reserved=0
>> 
>> Thanks for doing this. I would make one change (but it can be done after 
>> IETF-
>> LC)
>> 
>>    [...] the content SHOULD be considered untrusted and handled
>> accordingly.
>> 
>> You changed should to SHOULD, but in this case it really is a MUST.
>> 
>> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to