On Mon, 8 Apr 2019, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
As I understand it, marking something as Historic is something the IESG can
do without publishing a document. The changes to the IANA registries I'm
less clear about, but I believe it could also be done without a document.
To move to historic, there should be some form of document (per
https://www.ietf.org/blog/iesg-statement-designating-rfcs-historic/) but it
need not be published as an RFC. The past few times we've done this
everyone involved had to think for a while to remember what the right way
to wrangle the wording in the published RFC should be, but we can worry
about that later if we need to.
Historic really means "no longer used", which we all hope would be the
case for IKEv1, but sadly is not. Seeing how a billion android devices
only support IKEv1, I think "historic" is really not the correct action
at this point.
Paul
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
