On Wed, 29 Apr 2020, Tommy Pauly wrote:
Thanks for bringing this up again. Would you be interested in making this an RFC8229bis instead? I think it would be most useful for an implementer to fold some of these clarifications into the main text itself. How do you feel about that?
That might be better. We have also been working on the Linux and libreswan code for this, and have also gotten into a few corner cases that might be good to explain the implementors. Paul _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
