> Probably we can just reference RFC 4555. > > How about adding the following para > (I also quotet here a part of a previous para, since I noticed that RFC 4555 > in fact > doesn't contain normative language on these actions and thus we cannot use > word "requires", more neutral tone is needed): > > [...] Section 3.5 > of [RFC4555] states that a new INFORMATIONAL exchange with the > UPDATE_SA_ADDRESSES notify is initiated in case the address (or > transport) is changed while waiting for a response. > > Section 3.5 of [RFC4555] also states that once an IKE SA is switched > to a new IP address, all outstanding requests in this SA are > immediately retransmitted using this address. See also Section 7.2. > > Is it OK?
Perfect. -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
