> Probably we can just reference RFC 4555. 
> 
> How about adding the following para
> (I also quotet here a part of a previous para, since I noticed that RFC 4555 
> in fact
> doesn't contain normative language on these actions and thus we cannot use
> word "requires", more neutral tone is needed):
> 
>    [...] Section 3.5
>    of [RFC4555] states that a new INFORMATIONAL exchange with the
>    UPDATE_SA_ADDRESSES notify is initiated in case the address (or
>    transport) is changed while waiting for a response.
> 
>    Section 3.5 of [RFC4555] also states that once an IKE SA is switched
>    to a new IP address, all outstanding requests in this SA are
>    immediately retransmitted using this address.  See also Section 7.2.
> 
> Is it OK?

Perfect.
-- 
kivi...@iki.fi

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to