-----Original Message-----
From: iesg <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
Sent: den 25 augusti 2022 15:43
To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <[email protected]>
Cc: The IESG <[email protected]>; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-17:
(with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Hi Zaheduzzaman,
[inline]
Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[email protected]> writes:
> Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-17: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> this introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-posi
> tions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT
> positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for working on this specification. I found this spec to be a
> mix of transport and non-transport related topics and had to think a
> bit more due to lack of rational behind choices made.
>
> I would like to discuss - why there is no normative text (MUST/MUST
> NOT) for non-congestion controlled mode over operation in this
> specification that prohibits the use of non-congestion controlled mode
> out side of controlled environment?
Indeed, the suggested text we offered to add was:
"This MUST NOT be used when full admin control over the network cannot be
assured."
Ok, good.
> I am also supporting Lars's discuss on 3.1 ECN support.
This 2nd paragraph was added to satisfy this DISCUSS, please see the latest
version:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-17#section-3.1
I believe we will discussing those proposals, if they are good enough. Lets
continue the discussion in Lars's discuss thread.
//Zahed
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
