Greetings ipsecme, Wanted to follow up about draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt. Has there been sufficient support expressed in order for this draft to be adopted? From the adoption call, it looks like 7 people (including author) expressed support for adoption, no one spoke against adoption, 2 implementations (including the author's) exist, and there are 2 offers to review.
Thanks, Rebecca Rebecca Guthrie she/her Center for Cybersecurity Standards (CCSS) Cybersecurity Collaboration Center (CCC) National Security Agency (NSA) -----Original Message----- From: IPsec <ipsec-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tero Kivinen Sent: Monday, November 27, 2023 1:32 PM To: ipsec@ietf.org Subject: [IPsec] WG Adoption call for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt This is two week adoption call for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt. If you support adopting this document as a working group document for IPsecME to work on, and then at some point publish this as an RFC, send comments to this list. This adoption call ends 2023-12-13. Note, that I do want to see people saying that they think this document is worth of working on, and that they plan to review and comment on it. If I only get one or two people (including authors :-) to say they support this work, then there is no point of work on this in WG. -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
