Ketan Talaulikar has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-mlkem-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-mlkem/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to the authors and the WG for their work on this document. I have one comment or rather question to ask about a couple of normative references that are currently classified as informative. This might be a discussion point, but I don't know this feature enough to be a judge of that. [RFC5723] - due to the normative text in section 7.2 [RFC9242] - due to the normative text in section 7.1 Can the authors/WG/responsible AD check on this? _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
