Please ignore this email ... ballot entered on the wrong draft :-(
On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 11:02 PM Ketan Talaulikar via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote: > Ketan Talaulikar has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-mlkem-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-mlkem/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks to the authors and the WG for their work on this document. > > I have one comment or rather question to ask about a couple of normative > references that are currently classified as informative. This might be a > discussion point, but I don't know this feature enough to be a judge of > that. > > [RFC5723] - due to the normative text in section 7.2 > > [RFC9242] - due to the normative text in section 7.1 > > Can the authors/WG/responsible AD check on this? > > > >
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
