On 29/06/2013 00:41, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jun 2013, Matjaž Straus Istenič wrote: > >> Workaround is rather simple: use different link-local addresses on >> IPv6-enabled interfaces and you are safe. But, nevertheless, I think >> using same link-local pairs on links should not get you into any >> trouble, right? > > Correct, the same way that configuring fe80::1 on one interface and > fe80::2 on a second interface, and on this second interface the other > end should be able to have fe80::1 as its address, and everything should > work fine. Everything else is buggy, as you already have concluded.
Dumb question: would the same product fail if you configured 10.1.1.1 on two different IPv4 interfaces? (If yes, it tells you there is some sloppy basic design.) (And yes, I realise that the two OSPFs might have completely independent code bases.) Brian Brian