----- Forwarded message from Mark Tinka <[email protected]> ----- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:39:13 +0200 From: Mark Tinka <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [pfSense] IPv6 Routing in pfSense Organization: SEACOM User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37.6-24-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; i686; ; ) Reply-To: [email protected], pfSense support and discussion <[email protected]>
On Monday, July 01, 2013 06:23:03 PM Jim Pingle wrote: > Sure. A purely routed IPv6 setup was one of the first > things to work well on 2.1. > > We do not do any NAT on IPv6 by default, there is NPt if > someone really needs to do that, but it's all manual. > > And the settings for IPv4 and IPv6 are independent, you > can do NAT on IPv4 while routing IPv6. Excellent, Jim! Looking forward to 2.1. I suppose the other thing I'll then be thinking about is how end-users are assigned IPv6 address information. Typical deployments have tended to use SLAAC with DHCPv4 for the DNS. I've previously done SLAAC with DHCPv6 for DNS. >From what I can see on doc.pfsense.org, I see pfSense will support stateful address assignments using DHCPv6, in addition to SLAAC. Would you be able to confirm whether 2.1 or later will support DNS via DHCPv6 as well, as well as DHCP-PD? I suppose, for now, the default gateway will need to be assigned via SLAAC, the one thing about DHCPv6 I still don't find amusing. Cheers, Mark. _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://ativel.com http://postbiota.org AC894EC5: 38A5 5F46 A4FF 59B8 336B 47EE F46E 3489 AC89 4EC5
