I've been trying for many months to make DHCPv6-PD work reliably over PPPoE, but i haven't got any positive result until now. Besides that, i find confusing a lot of IPv6 options in the GUI. Other than that, Dual-Stack seems to work fine.
-- Tassos Nick Buraglio wrote on 01/07/2013 20:10: > I've worked pretty extensively with pfSense since it's early alpha > days and have had private builds with IPv6 for years and years. It > works well under 2.1-BETA and has supported DHCPv6-PD for a while on > the WAN side. I've been using the 2.1-BETA train in production for > a very long time with good results but I don't believe the IPv6 DNS is > assigned via IPv4, it doesn't exist in the IPv4 lease tracking file > and hacking through the interface code briefly it looks like there is > mechanism for obtaining the DNS via DHCPv6 on the WAN side. This is > further strengthened by the fact that I have correct ISP assigned IPv6 > name servers assigned to me and they exist in the places I expect > based on that code. > > nb > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Eugen Leitl <[email protected]> wrote: >> ----- Forwarded message from Mark Tinka <[email protected]> ----- >> >> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:39:13 +0200 >> From: Mark Tinka <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [pfSense] IPv6 Routing in pfSense >> Organization: SEACOM >> User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37.6-24-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; i686; ; ) >> Reply-To: [email protected], pfSense support and discussion >> <[email protected]> >> >> On Monday, July 01, 2013 06:23:03 PM Jim Pingle wrote: >> >>> Sure. A purely routed IPv6 setup was one of the first >>> things to work well on 2.1. >>> >>> We do not do any NAT on IPv6 by default, there is NPt if >>> someone really needs to do that, but it's all manual. >>> >>> And the settings for IPv4 and IPv6 are independent, you >>> can do NAT on IPv4 while routing IPv6. >> Excellent, Jim! >> >> Looking forward to 2.1. >> >> I suppose the other thing I'll then be thinking about is how >> end-users are assigned IPv6 address information. >> >> Typical deployments have tended to use SLAAC with DHCPv4 for >> the DNS. I've previously done SLAAC with DHCPv6 for DNS. >> >From what I can see on doc.pfsense.org, I see pfSense will >> support stateful address assignments using DHCPv6, in >> addition to SLAAC. >> >> Would you be able to confirm whether 2.1 or later will >> support DNS via DHCPv6 as well, as well as DHCP-PD? >> >> I suppose, for now, the default gateway will need to be >> assigned via SLAAC, the one thing about DHCPv6 I still don't >> find amusing. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Mark. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> List mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >> >> >> ----- End forwarded message ----- >> -- >> Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org >> ______________________________________________________________ >> ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://ativel.com http://postbiota.org >> AC894EC5: 38A5 5F46 A4FF 59B8 336B 47EE F46E 3489 AC89 4EC5
