So it seems that we agree.
.as
On 8/20/13 11:36 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>> > It may be some bias from some organizations or individuals in those
>> > regions, but at the end the decision of using /64, /60, /56 or /48
>> > depends on the ISP alone.
> As prefixes are allocated based on the amount of address space one
> needs, the ISP receives that allocation from RIR based on the intended
> usage. As such, it is also expected that the space is actually used for
> those purposes.
>
> Next to that there is a very nice IETF recommendation too...
>
> If ISPs are just going to give a single /64 to end-sites, then they
> could just as well just stick with IPv4.
