On 2013-08-20 16:40 , Arturo Servin wrote: > > So it seems that we agree.
No, we do not agree as your statement is wrong. I suggest you read up on: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-589 and as you claim to work for LACNIC: http://lacnic.net/en/politicas/manual5.html Greets, Jeroen > On 8/20/13 11:36 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote: >>>> It may be some bias from some organizations or individuals in those >>>> regions, but at the end the decision of using /64, /60, /56 or /48 >>>> depends on the ISP alone. >> As prefixes are allocated based on the amount of address space one >> needs, the ISP receives that allocation from RIR based on the intended >> usage. As such, it is also expected that the space is actually used for >> those purposes. >> >> Next to that there is a very nice IETF recommendation too... >> >> If ISPs are just going to give a single /64 to end-sites, then they >> could just as well just stick with IPv4.