Le 2014-01-22 11:54, Francis Dupont a écrit :
On 20/01/2014 17:12, Simon Perreault wrote:
> IIRC, recent versions of Bind open a socket per address on IPv4
=> not it is not by choice, just:
- DNS requires to answer from the address the request was received
- there is no standard/portable way to do this without the one
socket per address in IPv4 (if you need an argument, just ask what
this discussion is about :-)
Exactly what I had guessed. Thanks for confirming.
=> BIND polls from time to time interfaces to bind() to new addresses
(again, there is no standard/portable way to be notified. BTW we (ISC)
know this is a point which can be improved so if you know a generic
simple solution...)
Listening on a routing socket doesn't qualify as "generic" nor "simple",
does it? ;)
Simon
--
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
