On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 12:08:08PM -0800, Ca By wrote: > I hear this argument frequently (stateful bad, stateless good) but it is > seldom coupled with deployment experience. > > Makes you wonder why some of the largest ipv6-only deployments are stateful > (ds-lite, 464xlat, ...) and the stateless solutions are not even published > as rfcs or deployed at scale yet?
I wonder if that can be correlated with vendor business interest. Kind regards Philipp 'And now I'll be considered a conspirary theorist' Kern
