Yannis Nikolopoulos <[email protected]> writes: > p.s: 464xlat was never considered because I always thought of it as a > mobile solution.
I don't see why. If you can enable some other tunnelling solution on the CPE, then 464xlat should also be an option? You still end up with the scaling challenge on your NAT64 gateways of course. But that's at least well proven technology, if you take the mobile deployments into account. Bjørn
