On 06/04/2015 01:08 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Hello,
From our side we have seen lots of IPv4 traffic from sources originated from
AS15169 (UDP port 443) .We are using netflow to identify the traffic.
You're right,
We can also see the relevant IPv4/IPv6 traffic via Netflow, as it enters
our network, It's just weird that we don't see logs for the denied
matched IPv4 packets further down the network, as we do for IPv6...
Michalis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 10:30:11 +0300
From: Yannis Nikolopoulos <[email protected]>
Subject: IPv6 QUIC traffic
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Hello all,
we've been seeing IPv6 UDP traffic on port 443 coming from Google servers being
dropped on our ACLs. We realise that this is probably just
(QUIC-enabled) chrome browsers accessing google content.
Isn't it strange that no such IPv4 traffic exists?
cheers,
Yannis
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
ipv6-ops mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cluenet.de/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-ops
End of ipv6-ops Digest, Vol 123, Issue 1
****************************************
