On 2015-06-04 20:48, Ca By wrote:
FYI, the QUIC people have been informed 2x that UDP is not safe and
operators will rate limit it.
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!searchin/proto-quic/UDP/proto-quic/09L5YD2u5xU/EsZgXHJq0o4J
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!searchin/proto-quic/UDP/proto-quic/1tN6j-dErw0/3c7bEHQm2gMJ
Then evidence for this should turn up in the telemetry, you'd think.
(Which in turn means overblocking or throttling in every network you
control right now would convey your message better than "this might
happen", when it's not visible.)
At this point adding new L4 protocols won't work either because of
firewalls, router ACLs, CPEs and throttling. So it'd be out of the
frying pan into the fire.
Given that there is Happy Eyeballs for this and there is a probably not
too unreasonable fallback with HTTP/2, can't we just see how this plays
out? ;-)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
