On 5/Jun/15 12:00, Tore Anderson wrote: > * Philip Matthews <[email protected]> > >> We are looking particularly at combinations of the following IGPs: >> IS-IS, OSPFv2, OSPFv3, EIGRP. > We're using OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 as ships in the night for IPv4 and IPv6, > respectively. That said, somewhere far down in the darkest depths of my > TODO list I have an item about investigating the possibility of > replacing OSPFv2 for IPv4 with OSPFv3 + RFC 5838. I see this > possibility is briefly mentioned in your I-D - if you're able to gather > more information about the viability of such a solution, that would be > a very valuable addition to the I-D, I think.
The OSPFv3 spec. does support carriage of IPv4 NLRI in OSPFv3, although you'd still require IPv6 link-local communications for the OSPFv3 process itself. I know Juniper introduced support for this around Junos 9, and I know Cisco have it IOS 15. Would be nice to hear how come doing this, if you do go ahead. I'm ambivalent about whether I would do this if I were an OSPF house. Hopefully, I would... Mark.
