On 14.10.2016 15:20, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: >> At the end, the whole behavior is because some host have problems in >> handling situations where they have an IPv6 address configured and now >> internet connectivity. But the solution to this requires that the host >> is able to understand and work with RIO options, which seams to be "at >> the time" not generally the case. >> >> Do we replace one evil by another? > > I like Tore's solution of using ULA for local communication even when > the external link is down. That's not the question. The question is: Should a router stop advertising a default route if the (or better say "his") upstream link is down.
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature