On Jan 9, 2015, at 12:22 AM, "Jan Zorz @ go6.si" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/01/15 11:38, Ole Troan wrote: >> there are at least eight IETF solutions (L2TP, DS-lite, 464XLAT, >> Public 4over6, Lightweight 4over6, 4rd, MAP-T, MAP-E) to the same >> problem (IPv4 or shared IPv4 over IPv6). it's going to be interesting >> to figure out how 554bis should deal with that. > > Hi, > > my first thought would be to put them in Optional section? :) I would agree with this since all the options were developed for varying use cases and I'm not sure there's definitive subset we want to recommend. - merike > > What do you think or suggest? > > Cheers, Jan >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
