Am 09.01.2015 um 09:22 schrieb Jan Zorz @ go6.si:
On 07/01/15 11:38, Ole Troan wrote:
there are at least eight IETF solutions (L2TP, DS-lite, 464XLAT,
Public 4over6, Lightweight 4over6, 4rd, MAP-T, MAP-E) to the same
problem (IPv4 or shared IPv4 over IPv6). it's going to be interesting
to figure out how 554bis should deal with that.
Hi,
my first thought would be to put them in Optional section? :)
What do you think or suggest?
Cheers, Jan
Hi,
Yes, put them in the optional section. I don't think many vendors want
to implement all of them in their CPE routers. If we put too many
technologies in the "mandatory" section, the vendors will ignore the
document and it becomes useless.
Cheers, Wilhelm
