>>>> Tell me this. Would you be happier if the fragmentation rule said that the >>>> first fragment had to contain the entire IPv6 header, plus the transport >>>> layer header (for ACL support)? I think Fernando would support such a >>>> statement (I think I have "heard" him make such a statement). >>> >>> It would certainly make *me* happier�$,1s& >> >> done. >> RFC7112. > > As I wrote in another mail, > >> It may be relevant to ask for RFC 7112 support next time we're doing >> an equipment RFQ (in a few years). > ... >> But until RFC 7112 support is available, I believe we will >> see a significant amount of breakage for IPv6 extension headers - and >> header chains will be limited to significantly less than 1280 bytes. > > And until such support is available, we have to deal with the current > mess. Which may imply more filtering than some people would like.
I don’t think that follows. cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
