hello Job,

thanks for the update :)

On 07/09/2015 02:38 PM, Job Snijders wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 02:23:15PM +0300, Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote:
I'm not sure if people are using the fltr-martian-v6 filter set
maintained by Job Snijders:

filter-set:     fltr-martian-v6
descr:          Current IPv6 martians
mp-filter:      {
                 0000::/8^+,      # loopback, unspecified, v4-mapped
                 0200::/7^+,      # Reserved by IETF [RFC4048]
                 2001::/32^-,     # Teredo prefix [RFC4380]
                 2001:db8::/32^+, # NON-ROUTABLE range to be used for
documentation purpose [RFC3849]
                 2002::/16^-,     # 6to4 prefix [RFC3068]
                 3ffe::/16^+,     # used for the 6bone but was returned
[RFC5156]
                 5f00::/8^+,      # used for the 6bone but was returned
[RFC5156]
                 fc00::/7^+,      # Unique Local Unicast [RFC4193]
                 fe80::/10^+,     # Link Local Unicast [RFC4291]
                 fec0::/10^+,     # Reserved by IETF [RFC3879]
                 ff00::/8^+       # Multicast [RFC4291]
                 }

I'm trying to figure out why prefixes like 0200::/7 or 0400::/6 are not
included in this list

0200::/7 was already there.

Any ideas?

The answer is simple:

     Vurt:~ job$ whois fltr-martian-v6 | grep manual
     remarks:        this object is manually maintained

I've just updated it, manually :-)

Kind regards,

Job



Reply via email to