The problem is often internal networking. Every large cloud provider probably 
wrote their own overlay networking implementation, and would have to 
reimplement it for IPv6

Sent from my iPad

> On 07 May 2016, at 20:35, Benedikt Stockebrand <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Sander and list,
> 
> Sander Steffann <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> [DS-Lite starting to hurt on the content side]
>> 
>> It is starting. I know of one bank that is enabling IPv6 on their
>> online banking to avoid NAT444/DS-Lite/etc problems. For them the
>> major problem is that their fraud detection algorithm can't do their
>> work properly if everybody keeps coming in over CGN.
> 
> it is indeed.  But banks are more IT-savvy and more security aware than
> most other enterprises, so while the market is growing, it still is
> surprisingly (and frustratingly) small.
> 
> But it takes time for the word to spread, and more often than not people
> mistake IPv6 for the actual problem, rather than IPv4 over DS-Lite etc.
> 
>>> What I
>>> find plain weird is that the cloud providers don't realize this as a
>>> huge chance to get (and lock-in...) customers who need an IPv6 solution
>>> on short notice.
>> 
>> I agree. There could be a very nice market for them in the near future
>> if they would support IPv6. The CDNs seem to have realised this by
>> now...
> 
> This is another one of those weird things.  The CDNs to my knowledge
> just got it up and running, but why on earth are the cloud providers
> lagging behind?  With regard to networking they are doing pretty much
> the same: They host some customers stuff and make sure it is accessible
> from around the world.
> 
> Hmm.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
>    Benedikt
> 
> -- 
> Benedikt Stockebrand,                   Stepladder IT Training+Consulting
> Dipl.-Inform.                           http://www.stepladder-it.com/
> 
>          Business Grade IPv6 --- Consulting, Training, Projects
> 
> BIVBlog---Benedikt's IT Video Blog: http://www.stepladder-it.com/bivblog/
> 

Reply via email to