Perhaps you could also include some more columns about the devices/softwares used to deliver IPv6: -CPE (ie: SLAAC, DHCPv6, DS-Lite, etc…) -core network (ie: Cisco ASR1000 NAT64 feature, etc…) -software (ie: PowerDNS for DNS64, etc…)
I agree it’s sometimes sensible information as it may be the outcome of a long and painful work but some people may be willing to share that as it would promote those vendors and those specific softwares and it could send a message to those who are late in the game. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr <blocked::http://www.ipeva.fr/> - www.ipeva-studio.com <blocked::http://www.ipeva-studio.com/> Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur. > Le 19 mai 2016 à 09:18, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > Hi Colin, Marco, > > Very good points. I think to make it easy, I’m going to create an online > survey, not sure if today or tomorrow, I will have the time to make it. > > I will post the link on the list. > > Regards, > Jordi > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: ipv6-wg <[email protected]> en nombre de Marco Hogewoning > <[email protected]> > Responder a: <[email protected]> > Fecha: jueves, 19 de mayo de 2016, 7:40 > Para: Colin Petrie <[email protected]> > CC: <[email protected]> > Asunto: Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 residential service: What prefix, static, dynamic, > extra cost ? > >>> Hi Jordi, >>> >>> That could be a useful list to have somewhere, thanks for that. >>> >>>> On 19 May 2016, at 00:22, Colin Petrie <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 18/05/16 20:45, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: >>>>> So here are the questions for actual IPv6 services providers to >>>>> residential customers: >>>>> 1) What prefix size is provided? >>>>> 2) Is that prefix static or dynamic? >>>>> 3) In case is dynamic, there is a chance for static? >>>>> 4) Any extra cost for having it static, or having a bigger prefix (i.e., >>>>> /48 instead of /56)? >>>>> 5) If the customer has already a static IPv4 with a monthly charge, is >>>>> still IPv6 static prefix being charged on top of that? >>>> >>>> A related question that is not on the list above: >>>> 6) Can the customer delegate reverse DNS for the assigned IPv6 prefix? >>>> 6a) If the prefix is static, can they use an NS delegation? >>>> 6b) If the prefix is dynamic, can they consistently DNAME it to a >>>> customer-hosted zone that contains PTRs for 'some-subnet-size'? >>>> >>>> Of course, most residential customers probably don't care. But I mention >>>> it as both a DNS and IPv6 geek. It's something to consider. >>> >>> Would it be a lot of work to add 2 or 3 columns regarding the IPv4 support? >>> >>> 7) Do you still provide native IPv4 support? >>> 7a) globally routable address? yes/no, static/dynamic? >>> 7b) NAT444 (CGN) or DS-lite >>> 7c) NAT64 or 464-Xlat >> >> Still early, sorry for the reply to self. >> >> Maybe it is useful if it is organised based on type of network: >> wireless/wireline and/or carrier (cable, DSL, wifi, GSM). There might be >> differences in type of service based on the carrier. >> >> Marco >> > > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.consulintel.es > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the > individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, including attached files, is prohibited. > > > > > > *********************************************************************************************************** > Le service MailSecure d'IPeva confirme l'absence de virus et de spam dans ce > message. > *********************************************************************************************************** > >
