Hi, On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 03:20:58PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > I think you somehow answered yourself. It is non-acceptable usage (according > policy), and not just in RIPE but also the other RIRs.
Huh, what? Sub-allocations are perfectly fine according to RIPE policy,
and initially for all other RIRs (as that was part of the very first
IPv6 policy document).
So if you have an ISP customer that has no own LIR, sub-allocating a
/40 to them so they can give their customers /48s is the thing to do.
(But indeed, it's out of scope of this document which is really focused
on end user assignments)
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
