Kai 'wusel' Siering wrote on 07/10/2019 12:28:
On 07.10.19 13:21, Job Snijders wrote:
Perhaps Kai referred to the RIR system as a whole
I did. "the RIR system" does not mean "only RIPE".
spreading the blame out doesn't change much. The problem of ipv4
exhaustion has been under discussion since the early 1990s, and that
discussion encompassed the role of the RIRs as a whole, 240/4, ipv6, the
role of fairness in ip addressing policies and lots more besides.
You're welcome to propose that large cdns be assigned 240/4, although I
wonder about the optics and wisdom of handing out this address space
exclusively to the large players, and politely declining everyone else.
Nick
