* Job Snijders ([email protected]) [191008 05:37]: > If folks are serious about killing dual-stack ...
Hmm, I would rephrase that to: "If folks are serious about IPv6 and are willing to set a real incentive for this community to have a reality check and test their own infrastructure in a safe environment with losts of experts around..." Nobody wants to kill Dualstack right now. There will always be a legacy network as backup, like on every other RIPE meeting. But you won't see most of the common misconfigurations in a Dualstack Environment and it's time to move out of your comfort zone now. Manually switching from default SSID to some legacy fallback should not be a problem for those people with intentionally old infrastructure. People who still run Windows 95 in 2019 will clearly have the expertise to klick on a button, right? > Wouldn't it make more sense to first move this mailing list to an actual > ipv6-only environment? Bold move, but yes - why not? By now, everybody with fairly recent infrastructure should have at least Dualstack on their mailservers, so this shouldn't impose any problem, right? > Perhaps the WG could RIPE NCC to register a domain like > ripe-ipv6-only-wg.org. This domain would have authoritative nameservers > only reachable via IPv6, an MTA that doesn't have any IPv4 connectivity > & a webserver with the charter, CoC, and mailing list archive only > accessible via IPv6. Much like how Marco David's dnslabs.nl is set up? Nice idea. You would have my support for this. Bjørn
