Yes, correct, and SL-IMPACT must not become a blocking reference.

   Brian

Pekka Savola wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > Pekka, it's been a while, but my recollection is that we (the authors)
> > didn't agree and didn't see any support for your comments on the list.
> >
> > I could be wrong.
> 
> There was no opposition, and there was support for at least referencing
> the SL-IMPACT work (or something else, giving a fuller description of SL
> problems).
> 
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Christian Huitema wrote:
> > Actually, the 01 draft includes two changes to address Pekka's feedback:
> > add some explanatory text in section 2.2, address leak, and section 2.3,
> > routing pain; and in section 5, qualify that the replacement of site
> > local is only as secure if blocking rules are actually implemented at
> > site boundaries. But it is clear that we want to keep the document short
> > and concise, and thus chose to not widely expand the text in section 2
> > and 5.
> 
> Yes, I noticed that some (most?) changes were incorporated, but at least
> the above (which I believe was important, and had some support) wasn't.
> 
> Of course the question then would be would the doc be normative or
> informative.  The former could block the document unless SL-IMPACT is
> published soon.  As there is already enough description of the issues,
> informational would probably be close to the mark..
> 
> --
> Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Brian E Carpenter 
Distinguished Engineer, Internet Standards & Technology, IBM 

NEW ADDRESS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PLEASE UPDATE ADDRESS BOOK

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to