Sections 4 and 6 seem fine. Minor nit in 2.2 "which may cause" rather than "causing".
Minor nit in 3, "QoS" for "QOS". Also in 3, "in which addresses are not ambiguous and do not have a simple explicit scope." is maybe better left as "in which addresses are not ambiguous" or maybe change to "and thus do not have" But it is fine as is :) Tim On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 01:27:06PM -0500, Brian Haberman wrote: > This is a reminder that the last call on the deprecation document > ends today. In particular, the chairs would like to ensure that > the WG agrees on the actual deprecation text in Sections 4 & 6. > There has been few comments on this draft and it cannot proceed > unless the chairs can be sure that it has been thoroughly reviewed > and agreed upon. > > If you have reviewed the document, have no issues with it, and agree > on its content, please let the chairs and/or the working group know. > > Thanks, > Brian & Bob > IPv6 WG Chairs > > Brian Haberman wrote: > > >This is a IPv6 working group last call for comments on advancing the > >following document as an Proposed Standard: > > > > Title : Deprecating Site Local Addresses > > Author(s) : C. Huitema, B. Carpenter > > Filename : draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-site-local-01.txt > > Pages : 10 > > Date : 2003-10-13 > > > >Please send substantive comments to the ipv6 mailing list, and minor > >editorial comments to the authors. This last call period will end on 5 > >November 2003. > > > >Brian Haberman / Bob Hinden > >IPv6 W.G. Chairs > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
