On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:52:46 +0100 Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about simply calling whatever we end up with "organizational addresses"? > I think that captures it much better than "local", "site local", "private" > or whatever. > I agree. I think it is a more descriptive name. In accompanying text, I think it would be good to state that an individual can also be classed as an "organisation" for these purposes. (the name "entity addresses" comes to mind, but I think it is a bit too generic) Regards, Mark. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
