On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:52:46 +0100 Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about simply calling whatever we end up with "organizational addresses"?
> I think that captures it much better than "local", "site local", "private"
> or whatever.
>
I agree. I think it is a more descriptive name.
As long as the final name doesn't end up being "Hinden/Haberman" I am open to what every name the working group thinks is best :-)
I assume this suggestion means changing the title and text in the document from:
Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses
to:
Unique Organizational IPv6 Unicast Addresses
or:
Organizational IPv6 Unicast Addresses
Bob
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
