> How about simply calling whatever we end up with > "organizational addresses"? > I think that captures it much better than "local", "site > local", "private" > or whatever.
as others have pointed out these addresses will be used in non-'organisational' scenarios. therefore i prefer 'local' as it has the widest applicability. what is wrong with 'local'? Mat -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
