Alain Durand wrote:If you look at RFC3513, site locals were defined as fec0::/10 (and not fec0::/48)
If this is the case, what will we have gained from fec0::/48?
The opportunity to avoid this numbering clash. Idiots who use fd00::/48 will clash with each other, but the rest of us avoid clashes with each other and with the idiots.
so you could have done exactly what you describe. There is nothing new.
- Alain.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
