> RFC2772, 6bone routing practise
The 6bone is being turned off.
> RFC2894, router renumbering (an example contains FEC0) > RFC3111, SLP (an example contains FEC0) > RFC3142, TRT (an example contains FEC0)
If it's only used in an example, then I don't think an update is required. If these documents get redone for some other reason it would be good to change the examples. But it not worth the effort required to recycle these documents to just remove site-local from an example.
> RFC3177, recommendation on /48, some text about site local beeing /48
This is only a recommendation and updating it would likely open up Pandora's box for other changes.
> RFC3082, Notification and Subscription for SLP, an example talks about > site local
Same as examples above.
> RFC3484, default address selection
I think this would be good to update.
> RFC3513, IPv6 addr architecture
Very important and work underway.
> It seems to me that the main one to revisit is 3483. [I guess he meant 3484] >
So my take is that only the Address Architecture and Default Address Selection documents need to be listed.
Bob
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
