Pekka Savola wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Bob Hinden wrote: > > So my take is that only the Address Architecture and Default Address > > Selection documents need to be listed. > > FWIW, totally agree here. Listing those which had no issues of substance > only confuse the reader.
That isn't completely clear to me. We could say something like: This deprecation will require substantive updates to the Address Architecture and Default Address Selection documents [ref, ref]. The site local prefix is also mentioned in several other documents which need at most minor editorial updates [ref, ref, ref...]. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
