-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Hi Eric, | | |>I have been speaking to different |>companies here in Israel, and the basic answer is that if I |>can not have site locals and NAT then I will not move to IPv6. | | | If these people are happy with IPv4 NAT, why would they want | to move to IPv6? They couldn't need more address space (net 10 | is huge), they obviously don't care about peer-to-peer or | end-to-end connectivity outside their organization, I can't | imagine that they want to deploy any IPv6-only applications | or services... | | Margaret |
Right on. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/u2738Jx8FtbMZncRAqU7AJ44rfIJFVMlpdwVX8xK7/E7ZlZw3gCaAldK T2stP11svJvYXT2V1tjfVbU= =e3s8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
