>>>>> On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:13:26 +1100,
>>>>> "Nick 'Sharkey' Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> [...] In this particular case, "A" is a
>> CGA identifier, so it cannot equal to a normal EUI-64 identifier.
> I had not thought of this! So
> it is not a problem at all.
> In that case I'm entirely happy
> to go with just raising SHOULD
> to MUST and deleting the text
> explaining DIID.
Okay, I'm happy to reach the consensus, too.
> Sorry to have wasted your time ...
No need for an apology, you identified an issue that no one has ever
imagined, and I think the discussion so far was really productive.
Thanks for taking your time.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
