Choice is : 1) MAY ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 1:21 AM Subject: ICMPv6: Rate Limiting Configuration Per-Node or Per-Interfaces
I think the discussion about the ICMPv6 rate limiting is going in all directions and we are not going anywhere near the consensus. This email is my effort to bring some consensus on the issues. I think everyone agrees that per-interface configuration would be a perfect solution and will provide a fine grained control to the user. Is there anyone who disagrees with this ? (Pekka ??) The argument that I see from people (Pekka, Me, Havard) is that is it really worth the efforts to implement/ configure it or per-node configuration is good enough operationally. This is why we are suggesting it to be a MAY. Now instead of going into all the reasons/arguments and deviating the discussions from one direction to the other, could people please send their preferences ? So the question is: In your opinion (no reasoning please), the rate limiting configuration per-interface in the ICMPv6 spec should be a 1) SHOULD 2) MAY 3) Any of them is fine for you. My choice is 3. Regards Mukesh PS: If I got anything wrong in this mail, please direct your flaims to me in unicast messages :) -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
