> Following the discussions, it isn't entirely clear to me why we > could need to open this issue. I think that there is concensus > for keeping it as is (as described in Christian's mail). > > Am I missing something?
Hi John, I don't think you are missing anything. Besides, I don't have a hard stance to open this issue. What I said *open* is just for moving M/O flags document forward as author of this document because this issue occured during this thread although several documents (Node requirements, 2462-bis and etc.) already decided their stance IMO. I think I should listen for various opinions of this issue in conjunction with M/O flags document (neither Node requirement nor 2462-bis). Thanks. - Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park) - Mobile Platform Lab. Samsung Electronics. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
