>So, to avoid the confusion, I'd like to ask the WG whether they agree that >this >issue, addressed in draft-mkhalil-ipv6-fastra-04 (or later versions) should >not >be included in the current work of 2461bis.
It seems DNA task in my opinion, thus I support #2 to be removed from 2461bis. Thanks. Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park) Mobile Platform Laboratory. SAMSUNG Electronics -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
